تويت
الموقع التالى وبالظبط الصفحة المشار أليها تحتوي على كتب مفيدة عن الأمازيغ, ومن بينها كتاب حول الأمازيغية بعنوان "أربعة وأربعون درسا في االلغة الأمازيغية" للأستاذ محمد شفيق تجدونوه مقسما الى 11 جزءا في الموقع:<br />http://tawalt.com/monthly.cfm<br /><br />أتمنى أن يكون مفيدا لمن يهمه الأمر! <br />تحياتي,
-
-
_MD_RE: دروس في الأمازيغية (Online book)
<div align="left"><u><strong>The Spread of Berber language:</strong></u><br />In an interesting model for the spread of the Indo-European languages accross Europe, Colin Renfrew has proposed their diffusion by the steady progress of neolithic agriculture. The geometric increase in the productivity of the land allowed a population grouwht which gradually expanded weswards, displacing or absorbing the mesolithic populations. Curiously, he retains the older model of immigration from a heartland fro Semitic speakers who, he suggests, moved outwards from the Arabian peninsula around the third millennium BC, ultimately outnumbering and absorbing earlier language groups such as Sumerian. However, if we examine a map of the Afro-Asiatic languages - the easter Semitic group, Kushitic, Egyptian and Berber- both the centrality of the Nile Valley and the difficulty of positing the Arabian peninsula as "heratland" become evident. There has never been any suggestion that the Nile Valley was populated from the Arabian peninsula, nor of any major shift in its population. It seems intelectually more satisfying to suggest that the advent of the neolithic in the lower Nile Valley and the delta area caused a major rise in its population density, and a consequent spin-off to the east and north-west of groups of people who carried the new techniques, and relted language, with them. This would explain the presence of these group in the Arabian peninsula as well as in North Africa. The climatic conditions during this period would have made the movement outward from the Nile a far less forbidding enterprise than it would be today.<br />This suggestion cannot, at the moment, be more than speculative. Archeological evidence for a consistent movement of people is lacking, while, unlike the Indo-European languages, the Afro-Asiatic family was as whole has received little study. Only the most rudimentary comparative studies exist, and thus any diagram of the relationship between them is impossible. The one statement we can make is that the Berber languages are all remarkably similar, which suggests that their spread accross North Africa was relatively uniform and did not occur over a great period of time. The break between them and the old Egyptian (related to modern Coptic) could be explained by the physical barrier of the easter desert, which became more and more impassable as the Sahara dried out. Again, this would suggest that the separation of the two had taken place before the definitive drying out of the Sahara between 2,500 and 2,000BC.<br /><br />
<br /><br /><em>Tree of world populations, showing the relationship between the language and genetic groups</em><br /><br /><em>(From L. Cavalli-Sforza, P. P. Menozzi and A. Piazza, History and Geography of Human Genes, Princeton, N.J., 1994)</em><br /><br />From "The Berbers by Michael Brett and Elizabeth Fentress p. 15-16"</div>
-
_MD_RE: دروس في الأمازيغية (Online book)
مشكور أخي على مجهوداتك.
تانميرت باهرا ارغانمحمد لعضمات :lol:تعليق
-
_MD_RE: دروس في الأمازيغية (Online book)
<p align="center"><font size="5"><strong><font color="#3366ff">موقع لتعليم اللغة الأمازيغية:</font></strong> </font><a href="http://www.ircam.ma/ecoleamazighe/menu.htm"><font size="5">http://www.ircam.ma/ecoleamazighe/menu.htm</font></a></p>النمط يقتل الحضارة، والثقافة تتنفس من جدلية الاختلاف.تعليق
تعليق